Senior UX/UI Designer · Copenhagen
8 years of research, workshops, and tested interfaces — built on the belief that accessible design is simply good design.
Redesigned the patient registration and referral forms used by 4M people annually. 18 research sessions with users including those with low literacy, motor impairments, and screen reader dependency — leading to a 34% drop in form abandonment.
Led a 3-day co-design workshop with cross-functional teams across 6 markets to untangle a navigation structure that had grown over 12 years. Prototyped 4 directions, tested with 60 users, shipped to 180M monthly visitors.
Investigated why podcast listeners weren't exploring beyond their first show. Diary studies with 24 participants uncovered the real barrier — social proof, not search. Redesigned discovery around listener behaviour, validated with A/B test across 2M users.
Audited and redesigned the step-free route planner used by wheelchair users and parents with pushchairs. Ran field research at 12 stations, then ran 3 rounds of testing with mobility-impaired users. Achieved WCAG 2.1 AA across the full journey flow.
Write-up coming soon.
Write-up coming soon.
Write-up coming soon.
Audited this site's own brutalist visual language — flat color blocks, thick borders, hard offset shadows, the Space Grotesk/DM Sans/Space Mono type trio — and formalized it into a documented token scale and a reusable React component library. Every component is verified with an automated render-check and visual QA pipeline before shipping.
My work starts before the screen. User research, stakeholder workshops, and rounds of real-user testing shape everything I make. By the time I'm drawing, I already know what it needs to do — and who it needs to not leave behind.
Accessibility is the constraint that makes the work stronger. Colour contrast, keyboard navigation, screen reader logic, cognitive load — these are design problems, not compliance checkboxes.
See the work →Interviews, diary studies, analytics. Understanding people before designing for them.
Co-design sessions that align teams and surface constraints no brief ever mentions.
From sketch to clickable prototype at the fidelity that answers the specific question.
Moderated, unmoderated, heuristic. Never launch without evidence.
WCAG audit, assistive tech, real users with disabilities. Built in, not bolted on.
Every piece of information conveyed through colour also exists in text, pattern, or shape. Contrast is a baseline, not a finish line.
Every interactive element has a visible focus state. Skip links, logical tab order — not extras, but the interface itself.
Accessible names, landmark regions, live announcements. Tested with NVDA, JAWS, and VoiceOver before any prototype is done.
People with disabilities are included in every research round — not a separate study, but the same study as everyone else.
This page was tested against WCAG 2.2: markup, ARIA, color contrast (including focus indicators against their actual backgrounds), keyboard navigation, target sizes, and reduced-motion behaviour. 15 real issues were found — including a focus ring that was completely invisible on two case-study cards — and every one has been fixed. Nothing here is a claim without a receipt.
If you're building something that matters to people who've been left out of the design conversation — I want to hear from you.
Send me a message